Assertive Speech Acts in YouTube Comments on the ‘Democratic Candidates Debate Education’ Video

Authors

  • Cantika Khaerunnisa Wijaya UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Muhammad Ali Isa Penna UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten
  • Tatu Siti Rohbiah UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/jkaipbaku.v1i4.176

Keywords:

Assertive Speech Acts, Online Discussion, Searle’s Theory, YouTube Comments, Online Discourse

Abstract

This research explores how people use assertive speech acts in the comment section of a YouTube video titled “Democratic Candidates Debate: Education,” which was uploaded by ABC News. A qualitative method with content analysis is employed to examine how users share their thoughts, express agreement or disagreement, and participate in online discussions through assertive language. The data were collected from selected comments posted between 2019 and 2020, particularly those reacting to the candidates’ views on education. The analysis applies Searle’s speech act theory, focusing on seven types of assertive speech acts: claiming, stating, reporting, describing, informing, complaining, and concluding. A total of 24 assertive utterances were identified, with the following distribution: claiming (11), reporting (3), complaining (4), stating (2), informing (2), describing (1), and concluding (1). Among these, "claiming" appeared most frequently, indicating that many users shared strong opinions or support, especially for Andrew Yang’s stance on education. Overall, the findings suggest that YouTube serves not only as a platform for viewing content but also as a space where people actively engage in discussions, express their beliefs, and respond to public issues through language.

 

References

Ashfira, K. D., & Hardjanto, T. D. (2021). Assertive speech acts in Donald Trump’s presidential speeches. Lexicon, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v7i1.64574

Birner, B. J. (2012). Introduction to pragmatics. Wiley. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=9pQ3KPKY1hkC

Cummings, L. (2010). The Routledge pragmatics encyclopedia. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=LsyLAgAAQBAJ

Izar, J., Nasution, M. M., & Ratnasari, M. (2020). Assertive speech acts in Mata Najwa program of episode Gare-Gare Corona. Lexeme: Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v2i1.6996

Izar, J., Nasution, M. M., Afria, R., Harianto, N., & Sholiha, M. (2021). Expressive speech act in comic Bintang Emon’s speech in social media about social distancing. Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/titian.v5i1.13100

Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=IuWXCwAAQBAJ

Nisa, K., & Manaf, N. A. (2021). Analysis of illocutionary speech acts on student’s social media post and comments. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v10i1.44409

Prayitno, H. J., Huda, M., Inayah, N., Ermanto, Ardi, H., Giyoto, & Yusof, N. (2021). Politeness of directive speech acts on social media discourse and its implications for strengthening student character education in the era of global education. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16205

Puspitawati, N. L. A. (2022). Penggunaan YouTube sebagai salah satu alternatif media pembelajaran daring Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, 11(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_bahasa.v11i1.752

Putu Nindhya Nirmala, I., Kardana, I. N., & Pratama, A. D. Y. (2021). Speech acts variation in social media Instagram @punapibali. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.2.3199.180-184

Ruytenbeek, N. (2023). Indirect speech acts. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=E4RVzgEACAAJ

Sahu, A. (2019). The YouTube: A full history. Independently Published. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0M6qDwAAQBAJ

Searle, J., Kiefer, F., & Bierwisch, M. (2012). Speech act theory and pragmatics. Springer Netherlands. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=pCjpCAAAQBAJ

Senft, G. (2014). Understanding pragmatics. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2smkAgAAQBAJ

Sri Rahayu, & Amri, Y. K. (2023). Analysis of illocutionary speech acts on “WhatsApp” social media. LingLit Journal: Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33258/linglit.v4i1.859

Yunanda, Y., Rahmat, W., Samsiarni, S., & Rifai, A. A. B. B. M. (2022). Analysis of Fiersa Besari speech act on YouTube playlist “Episode Sebuah Jurnal”: Pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.51817/jpdr.v1i2.159

Zufferey, S., Moeschler, J., & Reboul, A. (2021). Implicatures. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DoLvwgEACAAJ

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Wijaya, C. K., Penna, M. A. I., & Rohbiah, T. S. (2025). Assertive Speech Acts in YouTube Comments on the ‘Democratic Candidates Debate Education’ Video. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Komunikasi, 1(4), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.61132/jkaipbaku.v1i4.176

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.