Efektivitas Instrumen Tes Uraian Dibandingkan dengan Tes Pilihan Ganda dalam Mengukur Hasil Belajar Siswa di MAN 2 Bantul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/jkaipbaku.v1i4.175Keywords:
Effectiveness, Essay Test, Learning Evaluation, Learning Outcomes, Multiple-Choice TestAbstract
Learning assessment is a crucial element in the educational process that aims to measure how well students understand the material taught. The tools chosen for measurement have a significant influence on the validity and accuracy of the assessment results. At MAN 2 Bantul, educators generally use two types of measurement tools, namely multiple-choice tests and essay tests. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of essay tests in comparison with multiple-choice tests in assessing student learning achievement at MAN 2 Bantul, using the direct interview method. This study was conducted to gain insight into the views of teachers and students regarding the effectiveness of both types of tests in the educational evaluation process. Data were collected through direct interviews with teachers and students who had experience in using both types of measurement tools. Data analysis was obtained using a descriptive qualitative approach to explore their views and experiences regarding the accuracy and appropriateness of tests in assessing learning outcomes. The findings from the interviews showed that multiple-choice tests were considered more effective and practical in measuring student learning outcomes because they used the JMD (Jogja Madrasah Digital) application, which immediately displayed the scores. However, the teachers also agreed that essay tests provided a more comprehensive analysis of learning outcomes because they encouraged students to think critically. This study recommends the implementation of a combination of both types of exams to make learning evaluation more efficient.
References
Agustin, R., Surani, D., Khasanah, A. N., Pratiwi, K. S., Nafizah, D., & Fajrin, R. I. M. (2023). Penggunaan tes pilihan ganda sebagai alat evaluasi di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 2 Kedawung Sragen. PANDU: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak dan Pendidikan Umum, 1(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v1i4.965
Ahmad, A., & Nipaah, N. (2017). Pengaruh efektivitas distraktor pada item tes pilihan ganda terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Jurnal Varian, 1(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.30812/varian.v1i1.52
Ariyanti, E., & Bhakti, Y. B. (2020). Perbandingan bentuk tes pilihan ganda dan teknik penskoran terhadap reliabilitas tes mata pelajaran kimia. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 12(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.30599/jti.v12i2.627
Diputera, A. M. (2019). Teori penilaian tes essai atau uraian. Journal Reseapedia, 1(1), 1–3.
Fauziah, N., & Lestari, M. A. (2020). Efektivitas penggunaan tes objektif dan tes subjektif dalam mengukur capaian pembelajaran kognitif siswa SMA. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.12345/jep.v14i2.2020
Hanifah, N., Studi, P., & Konseling, B. (2014). Perbandingan tingkat kesukaran, daya pembeda butir soal dan reliabilitas tes bentuk pilihan ganda biasa dan pilihan ganda asosiasi mata pelajaran ekonomi. SOSIO E-KONS, 6(1), 41–55.
Hidayat, R., & Pramesti, D. P. (2018). Pengaruh variasi bentuk penilaian terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada mata pelajaran IPS. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.54321/jpp.v9i1.2018
Muttaqin, M. Z., & Kusaeri, K. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian tes tertulis bentuk uraian untuk pembelajaran PAI berbasis masalah materi fiqh. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.20414/j-tatsqif.v15i1.1154
Nadya Putri Mtd, M., Butarbutar, M. I., Sinulingga, S. A. B., Marpaung, J. R., & Harahap, R. M. (2023). The importance of evaluation in learning and the consequences of manipulating it. Dewantara: Journal of Social Humanities Education, 2(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.30640/dewantara.v2i1.722
Putri, H., Susiani, D., Wandani, N. S., & Putri, F. A. (2022). Instrumen penilaian hasil pembelajaran kognitif pada tes uraian dan tes objektif. Jurnal Papeda: Jurnal Publikasi Pendidikan Dasar, 4(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v4i2.2649
Ramdliyani, L. (2011). Pengaruh tes uraian (essay) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis pada pokok bahasan garis singgung lingkaran. IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, 7–26.
Sakahuni, S., & Ramadhanti, A. (2021). Perbandingan hasil belajar menggunakan tes pilihan ganda ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Integrated Science Education Journal, 2(3), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v2i3.174
Salim, A., Suyuti, I., Prihantoro, W. K., Muqorrobin, A., & Nawangsasi, E. (2024). Integrating Javanese culture in Islamic education: The role of Pathok Negara Mosque. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 14(2), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v14i2.381-407
Samaduri, A. (2022). Analisis pemahaman konsep siswa yang diukur menggunakan tes pilihan ganda. Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 6(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v6i1.1466
Sari, W. K., & Mahendra, A. (2016). Analisis kualitas butir soal pilihan ganda berbasis HOTS dalam pembelajaran biologi SMA. Jurnal Penilaian Pendidikan, 7(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.98765/jpp.v7i3.2016
