Toponimi Pada Nama Desa di Kabupaten Mojokerto: Kajian Etnolinguistik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/jkaipbaku.v1i3.113Keywords:
Toponymy, Ethnolinguistics, Villages in MojokertoAbstract
Language cannot be separated from human life, humans who act as a role in the formation of civilization produce a masterpiece called culture and local wisdom. This study examines the relationship between the two which is related to the linguistics group. In linguistic studies, there is an approach, namely ethnolinguistics which is used to examine the relationship between language and community culture which produces various meanings of language. Through this approach, the study aims to describe the form of lexicon and toponymy of village names in Mojokerto Regency. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with a note-taking technique. The data source used in this study is a book entitled "Jejak Semar di Karang Klethak" by Haris ar-Rachi, et al. The results of the study show that the names of villages in Mojokerto Regency have a historical, mythological background, as well as strong local cultural and natural elements. The naming is closely related to historical figures, community legends, geographical conditions, and the spiritual values of the local community. This proves that village toponymy is not only linguistic, but also reflects local cultural identity which is important to preserve.
References
Ar-Rachi, D. (2024). Jejak Semar di Karang Klethak.
Baehaqie, I. (2013). Etnolinguistik: Telaah teoritis dan praktis. Cakrawala Media.
Damayanti, W. (2020). Leksikon adat istiadat pengobatan masyarakat Dayak Jalai Kabupaten Ketapang (Kajian etnolinguistik). Tuah Talino, 14(2), 135–136.
Djajasudarma, F. (2010). Metode linguistik: Ancangan metode penelitian dan kajian. Refika Aditama.
Fadhilla, A. N., Rahmatia, R., & Ulhaq, S. D. (2023). Kajian etnolinguistik: Toponimi nama jalan di Kelurahan Margasari Tangerang. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia, 12(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v12i3.72894
Febrindasari, C. (2018). Leksikon ‘hantu’ dalam Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian linguistik antropologis. Jurnal Handaya, 9(1), 10–21.
Nursani, G. F. (2022). Konsep ‘wajit’ dalam perspektif masyarakat Sunda (Kajian antropolinguistik di Kecamatan Cililin, Kabupaten Bandung Barat). Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia, 83–89. https://doi.org/10.51817/kimli.vi.28
Istiqomah, E., & Setyobudihono, S. (2017). Nilai budaya masyarakat Banjar Kalimantan Selatan: Studi indigenous. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 5(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v5n1.p1-6
Koentjaraningrat. (2005). Pengantar antropologi. Rineka Cipta.
Rondiyah, A. A., Wardani, N. E., & Saddhono, K. (2017). Pembelajaran sastra melalui bahasa dan budaya untuk meningkatkan pendidikan karakter kebangsaan di era MEA (Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN). The 1st Education and Language International Conference Proceedings Center for International Language Development of Unissula, 1(1), 141–147.
Rosidin, O. (2019). Percikan linguistik: Pengantar memahami ilmu bahasa. Untirta Press.
Simanjuntak, D. S. R. (2015). Penerapan teori antropolinguistik modern (competence, performance, indexicality, & participation) dalam umpasa budaya Batak Toba. Jurnal Basis, 2(2), 71–78.
Widiatmoko, S., Rahmawati, A., & Sekhudin, N. (2020). Penggunaan variasi leksikon suara burung oleh masyarakat Sunda: Kajian linguistik antropologis. Nusa: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(4), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.14710/nusa.15.4.492-505
